This is a friendly, interactive exchange of information on all Real Estate related subjects. Follow on Twitter: @RETALKS

Moderator: admin

User avatar
Topic Author
Posts: 8204
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 3:20 pm

Vancouver - From $13,500 To $1,100,000

Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:53 am

By Ozzie Jurock
Saturday, October 29, 2011

In 1960, a chocolate bar and an ice cream cone competed for that 10 cents in your pocket and your home sold for an average price of $13,105. Yes! By 1970 we reached $24,000, by 1980 we clocked in at $100,000, by 1990 - $230,000 and by 2000 - $296,000. In the last 11 years we rocketed from there to where we now are at $1,100,000 (average used home sale price between Lions Bay and Mission). And that ice cream cone? Approaches $4 dollars!

And that is what happens when you have inflation in hard assets. Milton Friedman stated 20 years ago: "Inflation is primarily a monetary problem". Money that is created out of thin air and competes with the money you and I earn makes all hard assets dearer. And, boy are we ever creating money out of thin air - worldwide.

Now we can argue that we have an inflation rate of only 2.1% (Poppycock). Realize that today's inflation basket does not allow for most food, housing, oil (in US). Go to to compare this to the 'Volker basket'. However, whatever your view, we have had a massive 50 year inflation in housing prices, driven by excess cheap easily available money and today we are doing more ... much more ... of the same.

Of course, we did not get to that million dollar average price in a straight line. Real Estate by its very nature is local, based on our collective confidence and thus cyclical.

We had a lot of valleys to go through. Throughout the '60s the largest mortgage you could get was 66% of value and you paid 9.5% for a 5-year term.

Almost every transaction needed a second mortgage and that one stood you 16.5%. Throughout the '70s, '80s and '90s rates were over 10.5%.

In 1974 the Dow Jones Average hit 1,000 for the first time only to collapse by 40% within 8 months. And our papers were full of: "real estate is next" and "Realtors are prowling like hungry tigers".

And the naysayers (the dried food, deflation, depression crowd) were out in force: "We will collapse."

In 1979 when our average price stood at $71,000 we saw an inflationary boom of some magnitude, culminating in the spring of 1981 at $181,000. However, by the fall of 1982 we collapsed by almost 40% to $110,000. Of course, a five-year mortgage term that soared to 16.5% was the culprit. Short-term money was 21%. Canada savings bonds paid 19.5%!

The naysayers brought out the champagne.

Yet by 1990 the average priced had doubled again to $230,000 even with a 5-year rate of 13.5% (!), but the bad news from the US spilled over (787 banks collapsed in 1990 in the Savings and Loan scandal; US housing prices crashed by 40%) and the early nineties were tough slugging. But by 1995 our average price had roared back to $340,000 (May). Alas, we had overbuilt, the immigrants fleeing Hong Kong failed to materialize (Mainland China having masterfully handled the Hong Kong repatriation into China) and down we went in price (- 17%) to $278,000 by 1998.

I wrote a book in 1998 Forget About Location, Location, Location in which I steadfastly argued that inflation was the culprit and if we kept printing money our average price would shoot to 6 million by 2036. You know the rest. Today, we stand at $1,100,000. Yet, naysayers are out in force again.

Real Estate remains cyclical. I have told my subscribers to expect a downturn in the interior and Vancouver Island over a year ago and a slowdown in Vancouver too. But, I remain convinced that the naysayers will be wrong again. Yes, the numbers are bigger, the zeros larger and yet each time - after climbing a wall of worry- we muddle through with the result that hard assets will be even higher again five to 10 years later.

House hunting is a little like duck hunting. When duck hunting one has to lead the duck. You have to shoot ahead to allow for the distance the duck is going to fly while your shotgun pellets are getting to him.

If you don't you'll always be shooting where the duck was, not where the duck is. Same thing with the real estate market. It is always changing. You have to know what's happening with the aspects involved in your potential purchase and the management of your existing property portfolio.

Published in The Vancouver Sun, October 2011

Ozzie Jurock is a senior real estate adviser and author of the Real Estate Action Book: Ozzie Jurock can be reached by email at or
User avatar
Real Estate Talker
Posts: 2596
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 7:25 pm
Location: If you Rent it you are still payin for it...

Re: Vancouver - From $13,500 To $1,100,000

Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:15 pm

Dear Ozzie:
Our friend Taipan owns an Ice Cream truck and he says you should never buy ice cream because it can melt while you are eating it...ESPECIALLY ON HOT DAYS. He has graphs to show you how fast it can melt too.
The best way to get ice cream is from your parents freezer. If you cant afford to buy your own, you just have to sneak upstairs from the basement suite that they provided for you and scoop it out of their freezer.
Real Estate Talker
Posts: 3353
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 1:41 pm

Re: Vancouver - From $13,500 To $1,100,000

Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:22 pm

ozzie, no duh

amazing how such a simple concept needs to be explained.

however, there is the possibility of a deflationary spiral. especially if the tea party gets in.

ok ahahaha no not really, but there you go.
Redistribute consumption, not income.
User avatar
Real Estate Talker
Posts: 5097
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:51 pm

Re: Vancouver - From $13,500 To $1,100,000

Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:42 pm

Indeed Ozzie. But earnings do matter, so I would argue. At least I'm pretty sure that's what you tell clients. How many hot properties in City of Vancouver?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests