It's the "how" wealthy Chinese immigrate.
Hide income and pay no taxes. Leave homes empty.
Avail themselves to every subsidized program by showing low income.
There isn't another culture that immigrates in such a way.
None of us believe this kind if immigration is healthy - whether it raises house prices or not.
It's not racism. It could be Irish people for all we care. The issue is that foreign ownership is pushing up RE costs and hollowing out our economy by making it too expensive to hire local people to create non RE based businesses.
I agree with most of what both of you are saying. It seems undeniable that the relatively recent wave of foreign buyers has had at least some impact on home prices, but ridiculously cheap mortgages look like a big factor too. The wealthy foreign buyer issue might account for the ever widening gap between desirable and less desirable neighbourhoods and that has destroyed a lot of dreams of upward mobility, but now even the rougher parts of the city are out of reach for many new entrants to the market and that appears to be unsustainable as well as socially undesirable.
It's easy to point at one single culture when ostentatious displays of wealth and aggressive tax avoidance techniques appear to be an unfortunately common part of that culture, but that showy behaviour often applies to people of most cultures when those people are raised out of poverty and have their first taste of wealth. I think a lot of it might be based on the insecurity associated with coming to a new country with a different language and where you are a visible minority.
The abuse of social programs is unacceptable regardless of race or culture. To suggest that only one group has been doing it in Canada is absurd. There is another very large group of immigrants in BC who are also stereotyped as being well aware of every rule and subsidy they can take advantage of, and many of them rarely miss any opportunity to benefit from our generous social programs. Regardless of how commonly the members of a visible group behave that way, the negative stereotypes should not be applied to individuals without evidence. It seems to be an unfortunately common part of human nature to take advantage of freebies whilst avoiding charges, particularly when the charges (or taxes) are so easily avoided.
I remember that in the 1970s my own people, the Brits, were notorious for arriving in Canada and milking every social benefit they could. Not all Brits did that, some (I hope most) were very morally aware, were grateful to be here, and contributed in major ways to this country. Suggesting that only one group engages in selfish abuse of our programs is simply not true.
Such abuse is obviously a problem and it is all the more annoying when abuse of social programs goes hand in hand with highly visible signs of luxury lifestyles. It is something which should be aggressively addressed wherever it happens, regardless of race or culture.
One last point. The problem is not race based, it is culturally based. Some cultures are horrible but good people often emerge from horrible cultures, just as horrible people often emerge from good cultures. Better to judge people on what they have done as individuals rather than what has been done by others who happen to look like them.
In fond memory of Taipan, a model of modesty, decency, dignity and tolerance. Long may we all prosper from the tremendous legacy of worldly wisdom and specialized real estate knowledge which he left in the "Arguments" thread.