reallyreal wrote:Because you behave that way (which I doubt you ever would in real life) and someone will eventually punch you in the head.
Oh dear, this is like taking candy from a baby.
Here is my statement which offended you to the point where you now admit contemplating a violent response:
"Yes, it does say something about me. It says that I don't have a binary mind, I see shades of grey which were obviously invisible to you when you wrote "They are all annoying. Or none of them are annoying." Apparently, in your world, all things are black or white, 1 or 0. Too bad, you are missing a lot."
And here is your strangely juvenile reply:
"LOL - I'd love to meet you one day. I would find it interesting if you would have this attitude when chatting to someone face to face? Probably not."
I strongly suspected that you were resorting to the thinly veiled "schoolyard bully" type of threat so common from people who lack the intellectual capacity to win verbal arguments. "If I can't win the debate I'll punch him in the head."
Thanks for revealing your true personality, if your attitude wasn't so sad it would be funny!
Now let's look at your latest silly comment:
My comment about real estate never crashing was sarcasm - apologies if that flew over your head....
Here is your statement (in context) and which you now obviously recognize as silly and now claim was sarcasm:
LOL - so we have a situation where whipmaster's effect on the forum quality is "probably" negative and it "might" be better if the payback was limited to a single thread. But under some hypothetical, if the market crashes (which it never will), the forum is "surely" doomed.
wow... biased much?
Please explain the "sarcasm" you intended by describing a market crash as something which is "hypothetical and will never happen". I'm pretty sure nobody else saw it as sarcasm either, just another one of your series of uninformed opinions.
Oh dear, are you going to threaten physically assault me now.